Practical Parsha: Ki Sisa – Aharon, Procrastinator in Chief

Aharon (Aaron), Moses’ brother, is the High Priest, and yet it is he who presided over the sin of the Golden Calf.  Why on earth do we honour him?

A cursory reading of Parsha Ki Sisa shows that Aharon effectively oversaw the fall of the Israelites into the sin of the Golden Calf, just weeks after the parting of the Red Sea and receiving the Ten “Commandments” at Mt. Sinai.

As we dig deeper, we learn indeed that Aharon took steps to control the sin while avoiding a full-fledged mutiny.

The people grew anxious as Moses’ didn’t arrive back at the time they believed he would. 

Aharon needed to stall them.  He asked for gold from ALL of them – in an attempt to create resistance, feeling that the women and children would be less likely to give up their jewelry.

When gathering the gold proved no hindrance, Aharon was surprised to find that indeed a Golden Calf emerged and seemed to have a spirit of life within it.

Again, he chose to delay – suggesting that he oversee the building of an altar so that they may celebrate ‘tomorrow’. 

Aharon’s goal was to delay so that Moses would have more time to return from the mountain.

Had he not agreed to build the altar himself, the Calf enthusiasts would have given him a boulder and a pebble and made a sacrifice then and there.

What do we learn?

Leadership can take the form of moving fast or moving slowly – keep the objective in mind.

Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Practical Parsha: Tetzaveh – Gaga over the Kohen Gadol

This week, in parsha Tetzaveh, we read mostly about the priestly garments of the Kohanim – and the Kohen Gadol – the High Priest.

Clothes have a purpose.  And in Judaism, as we see in this parsha, even the slightest detail in these garments had great purpose.

I have never been accused of being a flashy dresser or a fashion expert.

I do however innately understand that certain dress for certain occasions makes a difference in how we are seen and how we see ourselves.

In a world where Lady Gaga makes Dennis Rodman of the ’90′s seem like Dennis Rodman of the ’80′s, Tetzaveh reminds us that our clothes aren’t meant to turn us into crazy walking interest pieces.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle Backpack in college aside.

Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Practical Parsha: Terumah – Seeing 3D in 2D space

A weak entry this week.  Less practical, less parsha and more pop archaeology meets pop psychology.

Take a look at this picture.

According to this documentary, it could be a two dimensional representation of that which is described in this week’s Parsha – Terumah [Exodus 25:1 - 27:19].

I have no idea of the veracity of this claim.  I do know this week’s parsha describes in great detail the ark of the covenant and other accoutrements.

If you were to watch the video, you would see how this 2 dimensional engraving is “made 3 dimensional” to show perspective of the ark.

Again, its all hooey as far as I am concerned.

However, the technique is powerful.

The information presented is flat.  However, when you “draw it out” – when you know there are more dimensions, you can see it in an entirely new light.

All relationships work like this.  The world is only flat if we want it to be.

 

Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Economist 1843 – reviewed

I read through this 1843 edition of the Economist.  Will have more thoughts to share on it.  My brief take:

A massively pro-free trade publication, whose intent is repeal of the corn laws.

This is not hidden, if you read the first letter, you get the point.

The Economist was my favourite Friday morning read in my years in London, a must-read throughout all of my pre-family life and still a titillating option at airport bookstores.

What is truly amazing is the amount of public information is available and published even in 1843.  Some great nuggets:

Metropolitan Improvements.—The works are now about to commence in good earnest for forming Victoria Park. Great progress is being made by the Commissioners of the Metropolis Improvements in the formation of the new street at the West-end. The new street leading from Oxford street to Holborn has been marked out by the erection of poles along the line. Last week several houses were disposed of by auction, for the purpose of being taken down. Some delay has arisen in respect to the purchase of the houses which have formed the locality known as Little Ireland. Among the buildings to be removed is the chapel situated at the top of Plumtree street. In this street the whole of the houses on the west side will be shortly removed, for the new street which will lead from Waterloo bridge. In Belton street, in the line for this intended street, the inmates of several houses received notice to quit yesterday. The occupiers of the several houses forming the clump at the end of Monmouth street, in Holborn, have also received similar notices. Similar progress has been made with the new street communicating between Coventry street and Long acre. The line has been cleared from Castle street to Long Acre on the east. On the west side the inmates of the houses, it is expected, will in a few days have notice to quit. Improvements will also be made between Long acre and St Giles’s; and in Upper St Martin’s lane the whole of the houses on the west side will be removed, the greater part of which are already taken down.

Naturally, I picked one by Holborn, my tube station for university.

Some others:

Singular Employment of the Police.—Under an order recently issued by the commissioners of the metropolitan police, a number of the officers of each division have been actively engaged in collecting information and making out a return of all new houses completed since the year 1830, in which year the police force was established; all new houses commenced but not finished; all new churches, new chapels, new schools, and other public buildings; all new streets and squares formed since that period, with their names and the name of the neighbourhood.

And slightly more familiar:

 

DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY.

J. Halls, Wilkes street, Spitalfields, braid manufacturer.—J. Brooke, Liverpool, cupper.—J. Thorburn, Hillhouse, Yorkshire, warehouseman.—J. Allwright, Basingstoke, Hampshire, boot maker.—J. Bland, Leeds, eatinghouse keeper.—W.S. Lawrence, Essex place, Grange-road, Dalston, out of business.—T. Leete, Finedon, Northamptonshire, butcher.—W, Simpson, Elland Upper Edge, Yorkshire, woollen spinner.—D. M’George, Huddersfield, tea dealer.—W. Hall, Cockhill, Wiltshire, out of business.—T. Mercer, Wansdon house, Fulham, out of business.—W. Elliott, Berners street, Oxford street, waiter at an hotel.—C.T. Jones, Charles street, Berkeley square, out of business.—T. Price, Cardiff road, Monmouthshire, coal dealer.—W. Williams, Newport, Monmouthshire, out of business.—W.G. Still, High street, Poplar, hair dresser.—T. Cook, Giltspur street, City, tailor.—J. Mayson, Marlborough road, Old Kent road, commission agent.—D. Taylor, Meltham, Yorkshire, licensed tea dealer.—W.W. Greaves, Newark-upon-Trent, Nottinghamshire, corn dealer.—C.H. Balls, Beccles, Suffolk, chemist.—J. Chapman (commonly known as J. Fitzjames), Bridges street, Covent garden, comedian.

BANKRUPTCY ANNULLED.

JONES, T., Liverpool, coal dealer.

BANKRUPTS.

SHARP, R., jun., Faversham, Kent, draper. [Reed and Shaw, Friday street, Cheapside.

PEARSALL, C., Anderton, Cheshire, boiler maker. [Sharp and Co., Bedford row.

JOHNSON, T., late of Great Bridge, Staffordshire, draper. [Messrs Nicolls and Pardoe, Bewdley.

HOLT, W.J.; Grantham, Lincolnshire, tea dealer. [Messrs Hill and Matthews, St Mary Axe.

 

 

None of which should take away the main crux of the paper - FREE TRADE.

Even slavery, which the Economist deplored (Britain had freed itself of slavery before America), is contextualized around free trade:

But, moreover, our West India monopoly,—the existence of the high prohibitory differential duty on sugar, is the greatest, strongest, and least answerable argument at present used by slave-holding countries against emancipation. The following was put strongly to ourselves in Amsterdam a short time since by a large slave owner in Dutch Guiana:—"We should be glad," said he, "to follow your example, and emancipate our slaves, if it were possible; but as long as your[Pg 34]differential duties on sugar are maintained, it will be impossible. Here is an account sale of sugar produced in our colony, netting a return of 11l. per hogshead to the planter in Surinam; and here is an account sale of similar sugar sold in London, netting a return of 33l. to the planter in Demerara: the difference ascribable only to your differential duty. The fields of these two classes of planters are separated only by a few ditches. Now such is the effort made by the planter in Demerara to extend his cultivation to secure the high price of 33l., that he is importing free labourers from the hills of Hindostan, and from the coast of Africa, at great cost, and is willing to pay higher wages than labour will command even in Europe. Let us, then, emancipate our slaves, which, if it had any effect, would confer the privilege of a choice of employer, and Dutch Guiana would be depopulated in a day,—an easy means of increasing the supply of labour to the planters of Demerara, at the cost of entire annihilation of the cultivation of the estates in Surinam. But abandon your differential duties, give us the same price for our produce, and thus enable us to pay the same rate of wages, and I, for one, will not object to liberate my slaves to-morrow.”

 

In other great subjects of today, we are not without terrorism in 1843 as well.

Although Ireland was a hot issue (Repeal) and quite violent, the t-word goes to Wales:

Wales continues in a distracted state, and acts of incendiarism are common. The extraordinary verdict given by the inquest jury on the body of the unfortunate old woman who was shot, is the subject of general remark, as strikingly evincing the terrorism which prevails. There is even talk of the necessity of putting the country under martial law!

It may take a few hours to get through it – but I encourage it strongly.  A huge amount of media, economics and dentistry included.

(Feel free to join me in the discussion on twitter: Eddie_Weinhaus or LinkedIn.)

 

Posted in News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Practical Parsha: Mishpatim – Too Much Too Fast

Although its the Torah portion with a lot of the rules governing damages, murder etc, and although its a lot – that’s not what was too much, too fast.

In Parsha Mishpatim Exodus 21:1-24:18, we read of the promise of the Land of Israel:

Little by little shall I drive them away from before you, until you will become fruitful and make the Land your heritage.

It’s G-d talking here.  

Clearly, he doesn’t need to take his time driving out the Jews’ enemies.

Why not just let the Jews come to the land, clear it of enemies and then be done with the affair?

We can think of a parallel in the business world.  A new company enters the space facing old, established, but moribund competitors.  It behooves the new entrant to slowly pick away at the market and gain in strength at doing so.

If the established businesses were to collapse, would the small business be able to handle all of it?  

Most small businesses can get  killed by taking on too much too fast.

G-d shows that concern here too for the Jews:

I shall not drive them away from you in one year, lest the land will become desolate…

Rashi comments on the word “desolate”:

Devoid of people.  This would pose a problem for you, because you are few and there are not among you enough people to fill the land.

You simply cannot handle that much that fast.

Of course, this analogy doesn’t explain Groupon, but that’s another discussion.

[I will take a lesson, or story, or example from the week's Torah reading and do my best to apply it to something in the real world, according to my experience. Many apologies to the rabbis and partners with whom I have studied. What I write here is my own - when correct blessed only with their help, when off-base, firmly a result of my ignorance or worse.]

Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Practical Parsha: Yitro – Humility for Moses and the character of a Judge for Judge Roll

Talk about humility.  Moses had a rough week in this week’s parsha.

His father in law comes to town, criticizes him that he is on a path to failure, he gives up a great deal of power and the “big boss” goes directly to the people Moses has led.

For those of us who fancy ourselves leaders or powerful, any one of these steps might be insurmountable for our egos.

Moses makes it work.  

This week’s parsha is Yitro or Yisro (or Jethro) – Exodus 18:1-20:23.  [Yes, the Torah portion with the Ten Commandments is named for Jethro, minister of Midian and Moses' father-in-law, who converts to Judaism.]

Jethro says to Moses:

“The thing that you do is not good.”

Ouch.

Thanks for coming to see me Mr. Minister.

Of course, that’s not Moses’ response and the events that led to the criticism are instructive as well.  

Jethro’s own humility is attested at the beginning of the Parsha.  

“I, your father-in-law Jethro, have come to you, with your wife and her two sons with her.”

Rashi comments that Jethro’s request was to see Moses first on his own account.  To show his respect for Moses though, that even if Moses does not wish to see Jethro, then at least for the sake of Moses’ wife and if not for her sake, then for the sake of his own children.  The minister of Midian knew Moses’ greatness.  

Of course, showing respect in and of itself didn’t buy Jethro’s ticket to criticize Moses.  Before suggesting that “this thing” is “not good”, he first asked what Moses was doing and why.  Jethro also knew, that he didn’t know everything.

After receiving the explanation and observing Moses’ behaviour, he not only said it wasn’t good, but explained “why” it wasn’t good.  The consequences of Moses continuing the behaviour:

You will surely weary…You will not be able to do it alone.

Then, Jethro offers a solution.  But instead of suggesting that it is Jethro’s own observation that has merit, he asks Moses to touch base with G-d, to see if its a good idea.

Now, to the nature of the problem itself.  Moses was from morning to evening judging all the problems that people had.  They waited on him.

Jethro’s solution: create some more judges.  The other judges will handle the minor issues and the major issues will come to Moses.  According to Rashi, Moses handed over judgment duties to 78,600 other men.  

Now that’s giving up control.  He becomes the ultimate messenger of G-d’s will but gives up control as its sole spokesperson.

We also have one other major instance of Moses’ humility.  Although he was the only man to go to the top of Mt. Sinai, the entire people heard G-d’s voice.  Up until now, G-d had essentially spoken through Moses and Aaron.  But now, that the people were ready to receive they Torah, they make a new request of Moses.

Rashi writes:

I [Moses] heard from the people of Israel, they want to hear directly from you (G-d).

After all he had done for them, the people feel its time for them to hear (or see) G-d directly.  Moses brings this response directly back to G-d, who heeds it.  Moses’ own position is not a thought, for he acknowledges that he is just the messenger.

And what was the payoff?  The giving of the Ten Commandments (and the entire Torah).

===========

A short note on judges.  In Yitro, we learn the keys to being a good judge:

Men of means, G-d-fearing people, men of truth, people who despise money, and you shall appoint them leaders…

Each attribute is worth studying and should we only have judges like this, the world would be a better place.

Some judges soar even higher.

Later in the parsha, we read something else that I feel is worth mentioning:

…I carried you on the wings of eagles.

This is how G-d describes his taking the people of Israel out of Egypt.

Rashi comments that all other birds carry their young beneath them but for eagles.  For since no bird soars above the eagle, the only thing it must protect its young against are the arrows of man, so it puts itself in front of them to protect them.

Much like Judge John Roll:

 

Federal Judge John Roll was killed in Tucson trying to save another man’s life. As soon as madman Jared Lee Loughner finished his attempt to murder Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, he turned his gun on the people to his left, then the people to his right. Recently released video shows his first target to the right was Ron Barber, Gifford’s district director, who was standing next to Justice John Roll.

Barber was shot in the arm. Judge Roll then pushed him down and, shielding Barber with his own body, steered him to shelter under a nearby table. While under the table, Loughner aimed for Roll’s exposed back and pulled the trigger. The video continues as Judge Roll looks up over his right shoulder, lies back down and dies at the scene.

Some judges are more than G-d-fearing.  They are simply great men, like Judge John Roll.

===========

Other thoughts for the future:

Elevator: Elevating the special relationship by elevating others

The boss said…

Modesty to a rock

Kol Vachomer (times 2) and Hobgoblins

Love and fear at Sinai

Saying two things at once

Remember from whence you came

===========

 

[I will take a lesson, or story, or example from the week's Torah reading and do my best to apply it to something in the real world, according to my experience. Many apologies to the rabbis and partners with whom I have studied. What I write here is my own - when correct blessed only with their help, when off-base, firmly a result of my ignorance or worse.]

 
Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Practical Parsha: Nachshon’s Blue Ocean Strategy

EO, the Entrepreneur’s Organization, had recommended we read “Blue Ocean Strategy” some years back.

Find a new market where others don’t see it.  More than find – finding is only part of the issue.  Once you find it, you have to act on it.

In this week’s parsha, Beshalach (Exodus 13:17 – 17:16), we see the Jews’ Blue Ocean Strategy.

Boxed between Pharoah’s army and the Sea of Reeds, the Jews ‘cried out’ in prayer.  

G-d told Moses:

Why do you cry out to Me?  Speak to the Children of Israel and let them journey!

And journey they did – famously – across the Sea of Reeds which split before them.  But that’s not the exact order of things.

Someone had to go into the Sea of Reeds first.  Someone had to ACT upon the opportunity before them.

Each tribe was unwilling to be the first to enter the sea. Then sprang forward Nachshon the son of Aminadav and descended first into the sea [and they all followed him]…

[Talmud Sotah 37a]

Nachshon went first into the Sea of Reads and was well into it before it had receded to dry ground.  

Its not just hearing the words or believing.  Its acting.

===========

Some other thoughts from Beshalach:

- the wandering honeypot

- the road less traveled

- Dothan and Abiram and Ross Perot’s snake

- “While I’ve got you here” and the meat-eaters

- Moab and Edom - why missed opportunities matter [really goes well with the thought above]

- Do not delay – Moses delays twice in one parsha

 

[I will take a lesson, or story, or example from the week's Torah reading and do my best to apply it to something in the real world, according to my experience. Many apologies to the rabbis and partners with whom I have studied. What I write here is my own - when correct blessed only with their help, when off-base, firmly a result of my ignorance or worse.]

 

 

Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Cunning as Non-Traditional in Forbes

Forbes gave BlockShopper a nice mention in Morgan Brennan’s piece on hiding names from the public record – particularly by celebrities.

My favourite bit:

Eddie Weinhaus, Blockshopper’s Chief Operating Officer, says it’s common for high profile individuals to hide their real estate holdings behind specially established trusts and straw buyers.  That doesn’t, however, stop the curious masses from rooting out who the actual owners are.

“It’s harder and rarer than you think to hide your name from public record on a real estate transaction,” explains Weinhaus.  “Either you have to be extremely wealthy or doing a very non-traditional transaction for real estate.”

One note – I had summarized the ‘non-traditional’ part to be more in line with my real estate investment analysi background.  Restated:

“Either you have to be extremely wealthy or very cunning.”

Nonetheless, I was quoted accurately, as both are true.

And the reason?  Morgan nailed that too:

If a traditional mortgage loan is involved, forget it — a celebrity’s affiliation with that property is almost instantly known.

Posted in News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The inimitable Teachers Make Too Much adds Joel Klein…

Teachers Make Too Much.com: Joel Klein Joins Our Editorial Board

Posted in News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Kosher Nation: A smattering of favourite lines

One of a few posts on “Kosher Nation“.

Some favourite lines:

  • MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS don’t make kosher food to help Jews turn their bodies into holy vessels. They do it to make money. The Orthodox Union reports that in forty-five years, fewer than a dozen companies dropped their kosher supervision because it didn’t help sales.
  • Rosenfeld believes that although kosher-keeping Jews are no longer the majority of people who buy kosher food, they are still the industry’s driving force. They shop for Shabbat on Thursday evening and Friday morning, producing a predictable end-of-week sales bump, and they buy high-priced kosher products like meat, wine, and prepared foods. Supermarkets want to keep them coming into the stores, and food manufacturers want them buying new products. And they are not shy about expressing their opinions. “Jews are vocal,”
  • 1935, Rabbi Tobias Geffen of Congregation Shearith Israel in Atlanta, where Coca-Cola headquarters was located, began receiving letters from Orthodox colleagues around the country, telling him their people were drinking Coke and begging him to find out if the ingredients were kosher. Geffen met with company executives, and they gave him a list of the ingredients in the soft drink—but not their percentages—on condition that he keep the information strictly to himself. Geffen found two ingredients that were problematic under kosher law: glycerin made from non-kosher beef tallow, and traces of grain alcohol, which cannot be consumed during Passover because grain-based products must be produced in a special way for Passover use. Company executives were so persuaded of the need to satisfy the very small market of kosher-keeping Jews that they agreed to replace those ingredients, an amazing step for a major food manufacturer to take at the time. Geffen wrote back to his colleagues giving Coca-Cola his stamp of approval. Keeping his promise not to reveal the drink’s actual recipe, he referred to its two non-kosher ingredients by the biblical names given to two of the eleven spices used in the daily incense offering in Jerusalem, whose identities were lost when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE. He knew the rabbis would get his meaning: best to hold off drinking Coke until those ingredients are replaced.
  • All of these are projections of the human need to know why onto a text that does not reveal its motivation. The standard Orthodox position is, God said eat this and don’t eat that, and that’s why we do it.
  • the Orthodox Union’s Kosher Division (OU Kosher), the world’s largest kosher certification agency. More than four hundred thousand products manufactured in eight thousand plants owned by three thousand companies in eighty different countries carry the OU’s well-known kosher symbol, a U inside a circle. An estimated one thousand mashgichim supervise the making of those products, their efforts overseen by fifty or so rabbinic coordinators working out of OU headquarters in lower Manhattan.
  • But the Big Four’s share of the market continues to expand, both because they work with the largest food manufacturers and because they buy out smaller agencies and take over their accounts. In 2008 alone, the Orthodox Union bought the Half-Moon K, a Los Angeles–based organization that certified such well-known products as Kikkoman soy sauce and Campbell’s vegetarian vegetable soup, as well as Western Kosher in Winnipeg, Manitoba, which supervised 120 mostly Canadian companies. These consolidations result in universally higher kashrut standards, as many of the smaller certifications follow less strict guidelines. But it also decreases competition, which some critics fear will lead to higher fees for kosher supervision.
  • Few new food items are launched without kosher certification in the United States today, their manufacturers considering it less expensive to pay the supervision fees than risk cutting themselves off from a large part of their potential customers.
  • Rabbi Mayer Kurcfeld of the Star-K says that in the 1980s his agency saw an OU label on Fuji film. There is no reason why film would need kosher certification, so the Star-K alerted the OU, which contacted Fuji headquarters in Japan. The company apologized and said they had been told that products with this symbol “sell better in the United States,” Kurcfeld says.
  • Because rabbis and synagogues were allowed to buy wine for ritual purposes, some congregations saw their numbers swell during Prohibition. Rabbi Horowitz says membership in Los Angeles’s historic Breed Street Shul jumped from 100 to 1,500 people during that period, a statistic not unrelated, he believes, to the fact that members could legally buy wine.
  • But kashrut standards are more rigorous than those of the United States Department of Agriculture, which considers mushrooms infested only if there are twenty or more maggots per hundred grams. Up to sixty insects per hundred grams of frozen broccoli are permitted, as are fifty insects per one hundred grams of frozen spinach. According to Jewish law, the presence of even one insect makes the fruit or vegetable unfit for human consumption.
  • The People’s Republic is the fastest-growing producer of kosher food and kosher food ingredients in the world, with nearly two thousand factories under kosher supervision, all by foreign agencies. All the major American agencies are working there—the OU, OK, Star-K, and Kof-K—as well as smaller ones such as the kosher vaads of St. Louis and Vancouver, the big Israeli and European kosher agencies, and dozens of ultra-Orthodox heimishe certifiers representing their own hassidic communities. Most of the fifty or sixty mashgichim who supervise those plants fly in from Israel, Australia, or the United States, although the agencies also hire Chabad rabbis resident in China, who are happy to do a little moonlighting.
  • There are, he says, “a lot of rabbis running around China.”…In 2007, its food export sales totaled $2.5 billion, an estimated half of which is kosher certified.
  • Apparently Chinese food manufacturers don’t trust the system completely, or don’t believe the foreign companies they deal with will trust it, because Grunberg says applications for kosher supervision in China doubled in the first six months after the milk scare as the Chinese sought to reassure American consumers
  • They soon discovered that not everything could be made kosher. Companies that made products containing shrimp paste or pork, or that mixed dairy and meat, would clamor for certification and become angry when they were turned away. Some offered the agencies more money as if it were simply a matter of bargaining.
 
 

 

Posted in News | Tagged , | Leave a comment